Why the comments section matters more than the content

Most people don’t fully watch your video. They don’t read your post line by line. They don’t carefully evaluate your argument.

Instead, they scroll.

And before they decide whether something is worth their attention, they do one thing first:

They open the comment section.

This isn’t new, but it has become dominant behavior.

The comments section has turned into a filter layer:

• Is this worth my time?
• Is this credible?
• Do people like me engage with this?
• Is there something interesting happening here?

In many cases, people trust the comments more than the content.

‍

The new role of comments: social context, not feedback

Comments used to be feedback for the creator.

Today, they serve a different function:
They help the next viewer decide what to think.

Comments provide:

• social proof
• interpretation
• tone
• emotional framing
• shortcuts to meaning

A post with average content and great comments often outperforms a great post with no comments.

This is why the highest praise brands chase right now isn’t:

“Great content.” It’s: “Give the social media manager a raise.”

Because that comment signals:

• cultural awareness
• timing
• restraint
• intelligence

And people scrolling think:
“If others think this is smart, it probably is.”

‍

Why people comment (and why most content fails to trigger it)

People don’t comment because they were asked to.

They comment because:

• they feel smart
• they feel seen
• they feel invited
• they feel challenged
• they feel represented

Most content fails because it’s too complete.

It explains everything.
It closes every loop.
It leaves no room for reaction.

Good content informs.
Great content creates participation.

‍

How to design content for comments (without begging for them)

Below are proven, repeatable strategies you can intentionally use. Not all at once.
One per piece of content is usually enough.

‍

1. Intentional “mistakes” that feel accidental

This works because people love correcting.

Examples:

• a typo
• something weird in the background
• a slightly wrong stat
• a flipped comparison
• an obvious but harmless error

The key:
It must be safe to correct.

People should comment to feel helpful, not hostile.

‍

2. Forced choices instead of open questions

Open questions require thinking. Binary choices require instinct.

Instead of: “What do you think?”

Use:

• This or that?
• Agree or disagree?
• Would you choose A or B?

Make sure both options are defensible.
Debate fuels comments.

‍

3. Say what people already think but rarely say

This creates instant validation. When you articulate a shared but unspoken frustration, people comment to say:

• “Exactly”
• “This.”
• “Finally someone said it”

These comments stack fast because they’re low effort and emotionally charged.

‍

4. Slightly wrong framing (not wrong facts)

You don’t need to be incorrect. You just need to be simplified enough to invite correction.

Examples:

• grouping things together that purists would separate
• labeling something in a way people disagree with
• presenting a rule where people know exceptions exist

Comments become clarifications, nuance, debate.

That’s engagement.

‍

5. Ask for lived experience, not opinions

Opinions are optional. Experience feels earned.

Instead of: “What do you think about this?”

Use:

• “Has this happened to you?”
• “Who else experienced this?”
• “When was the first time you noticed this?”

These comments are longer, more personal and algorithm-friendly.

‍

6. Leave strategic gaps

Humans hate incomplete patterns.

You can use:

• “Most people miss one thing here…”
• “This only works if you avoid one mistake”
• “There’s a reason this fails for most teams”

Don’t explain it immediately. Let people fill the gap in the comments.

‍

7. Use small, relatable confessions

Self-exposure lowers the response barrier. When you admit something small and real, people feel permission to share too.

Examples:

• “I avoided this for years”
• “I used to think this was stupid”
• “This still trips me up sometimes”

Comments turn into recognition, not critique.

‍

8. Create a soft villain

Comments need something to react against.

Good villains:

• outdated advice
• old industry norms
• “the way it’s always been done”
• faceless systems or trends

Never attack people. Attack habits or ideas.

‍

9. Predict the comment before it happens

You can open the door by acknowledging the obvious response.

Example: “Yes, someone will say ‘it depends’. And they’re right. But here’s the pattern I keep seeing.”

Now people comment:

• to agree
• to expand
• to challenge

You’ve already invited them in.

‍

10. Make the comment bait feel unintentional

The best comment triggers don’t look like CTAs.

They look like:

• side remarks
• throwaway lines
• casual observations

People don’t want to be asked to comment. They want to feel compelled to respond.

‍

The real shift: content is no longer the destination

Content is the entry point.

The comments section is where:

• trust is built
• meaning is negotiated
• attention is extended
• identity is signaled

If you design content that gives people something to do, not just something to consume, the comments take care of the rest.

‍

Final takeaway

If you want more reach, don’t optimize for likes.
If you want more trust, don’t optimize for clarity alone.

Optimize for reaction.

Because today, the comment section isn’t a side effect.

It’s the signal.